摘要: |
已有的创新管理研究假定管理者基于同质化的战略认知解读不同创新要素与创新战略之间的适配性,但在激烈的行业竞争动态中,管理者的战略认知并不总是趋同。本文利用主题分析技术捕捉了跨组织边界的管理者在行业既定战略主题上所表现出的战略认知差异,并揭示了行业场景中这种战略认知差异对企业创新的影响。研究结果显示:首先,管理者的战略认知差异显著促进企业创新投入强度,在经过工具变量调整、更改主题数量以及替换变量等稳健性检验后,上述关系依然成立。其次,从创新结果来看,战略认知差异对企业专利申请总量、发明专利申请总量以及专利被引均能产生显著的促进作用。再者,从影响机制来看,探索性学习以及知识组合多样性在战略认知差异与企业创新投入的关系中发挥了部分中介作用;并且,多元化的业务情境能够缓解战略认知差异引致的合法性风险,增强其创新促进效应。最后,异质性分析发现,在家族企业以及国有产权性质的研究样本中,受到来自家族权威以及行政制度的干预,战略认知差异的创新决策效应不再显著。研究结论从战略认知差异视角拓展了企业创新的前因研究,同时为理解中国企业的创新决策逻辑以及探究创新人才培养路径提供了理论参考。 |
关键词: 战略认知差异 企业创新 家族企业 产权性质 文本主题分析 |
DOI: |
分类号: |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目) |
|
Strategic Cognitive Differences and Enterprise Innovation: being unconventional or being innovative? |
Wanglan
|
南开大学
|
Abstract: |
The existing research on innovation management assumes that managers interpret the fit between different innovation elements and innovation strategies based on the homogenization of strategic cognition. However, in the fiercely competitive dynamics of the industry, managers' strategic cognition is not always convergent. This study uses the topic analysis technique to capture the differences in strategic cognition between managers across organizational boundaries on the established strategic themes of the industry, and reveal the impact of such strategic cognition differences on enterprise innovation in the industry scenario. The results demonstrate that differences in managers' strategic cognition can significantly enhance the innovation investment intensity of enterprises. Additionally, from the perspective of innovation outcomes, strategic cognitive differences can significantly promote the total number of patent applications, the total number of invention patent applications, and patent citations. Furthermore, in terms of the influence mechanism, exploratory learning and knowledge portfolio diversity partially mediate the relationship between strategic cognitive differences and enterprise innovation investment. Moreover, diversified business situations can mitigate the legitimacy risk caused by strategic cognitive differences and enhance their innovation promotion effect. Finally, heterogeneity analysis reveals that in the research samples of family enterprises and state-owned property rights, the innovation decision-making effect of strategic cognitive differences is no longer significant due to the intervention of family authority and administrative systems. The conclusion expands the study of the antecedents of firm innovation from the perspective of strategic cognition differences, and provides a theoretical reference for understanding the logic of Chinese firms' innovation decision-making and exploring the path of innovative talent training. |
Key words: strategic cognition differences innovation family business property right text topic analysis |