平台独家交易的策略选择与反竞争效应研究
作者:
作者单位:

上海财经大学 商学院,上海 200433

作者简介:

陈迁(1990—),男,博士研究生,研究方向为实证产业组织、双边市场,chenqian900105@hotmail.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F062.9

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“家用主机游戏市场中的网络外部性与平台企业竞争问题研究”(CXJJ-2020-395)。


Strategic Options and Anti-Competitive Effects of Exclusive Dealing by Platforms
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • 图/表
  • 访问统计
  • 参考文献
  • 相似文献
  • 引证文献
  • 资源附件
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    近期,双边平台“二选一”独家交易行为受到广泛关注。通过构建双寡头动态博弈模型,并考虑竞争对手面对平台排他行为的策略反应,研究发现,当平台间横向差异较大且服务成本较低时,一家平台实施排他性协议,竞争对手平台选择积极应对是均衡结果。进一步,地福利分析发现独家交易策略会损害消费者剩余,造成社会福利损失,有很强的反竞争效应。研究结论不仅丰富了经济学对于双边平台滥用市场势力的理论研究,也为今后平台经济领域的反垄断执法提供理论借鉴。

    Abstract:

    The exclusive dealing behavior of “pick one of two” on two-sided platforms has received widespread attention. It constructed a duopoly dynamic game model and considered the strategic response of competitors to the platform’s exclusive behavior. The result shows that when there is a significant horizontal differentiation between platforms and the service cost is low, there is an equilibrium that one platform implements exclusive dealing and the competitor platform chooses to actively respond. Furthermore, welfare analysis reveals that exclusive dealing leads to loss of consumer surplus and social efficiency, which implies that exclusive dealing strategy has the strong anti-competitive effect. The conclusions not only enrich the economic research about platforms’ abuse of market power, but also provide references to antitrust authorities in the future.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈迁.平台独家交易的策略选择与反竞争效应研究[J].研究与发展管理,2023,35(5):175~186

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-23
  • 最后修改日期:2022-11-07
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-10
  • 出版日期: 2023-11-10

扫码关注

官方微信

×
专栏征稿|人工智能与组织创新