数字化转型的合法性困境:企业社会责任“象征承诺”与“实质履行”的代理冲突
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

吉林大学 商学与管理学院,长春 130012

作者简介:

田 虹(1966—),女,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为战略管理、技术创新和企业社会责任,tianhong2919@163.com。

通讯作者:

刘雨湉(2000—),女,博士研究生,研究方向为战略管理、技术创新和企业社会责任,1078956779@qq.com。

中图分类号:

F270

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“中国组织情境下亲环境行为的形成机理及影响效果研究”(20FGLB039)。


Legitimacy Dilemma of Digital Transformation: Agency Conflict Between “Symbolic Commitment” and “Substantive Fulfillment” of Corporate Social Responsibility
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    数字化转型对于推动企业实现高效运营、增强市场竞争力及促进长期可持续发展具有至关重要的作用。然而,数字化转型对企业社会责任的影响尚不完全清晰,尤其是考虑到合法性压力和委托代理问题共同作用下的矛盾关系时。为了探讨合法性压力与委托代理共同作用下数字化转型对企业社会责任的复杂影响机制以及控股股东股权质押情境下的异质性表现,基于合法性理论和委托代理理论,以2010—2021年中国沪深A股公司为样本进行检验。结果表明,数字化转型与象征性企业社会责任显著正相关,而与实质性企业社会责任呈倒U形关系,且数字化转型水平越高,企业社会责任脱钩越严重。控股股东股权质押的企业往往利用信息不对称和企业社会责任报告的可操纵性进行象征性企业社会责任,而不履行实质性企业社会责任,加剧了企业社会责任脱钩;无控股股东股权质押的企业兼顾实质性企业社会责任与象征性企业社会责任,脱钩现象不明显。进一步区分企业性质进行检验,委托代理机制仍然成立。研究结论丰富了矛盾管理中数字化转型与企业社会责任关系的理论框架,揭示了合法性压力和委托代理双重作用下的企业社会责任异质性表现以及矛盾管理策略,并为进一步解释复杂矛盾关系提供新的思路。

    Abstract:

    Digital transformation plays a critical role in driving businesses to achieve operational efficiency, enhance market competitiveness and promote long-term sustainable growth. However, the impact of digital transformation on CSR is not yet fully clear, especially when considering the contradictory relationship between legitimacy pressure and principal-agent issues. It aimed to explore the complex impact mechanism of digital transformation on CSR under the combined effect of legitimacy pressure and principal agent, as well as the heterogeneous performance in the context of controlling shareholders’ equity pledges. Based on legitimacy theory and principal-agent theory, hypothesis testing was conducted on a sample of Chinese Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share companies from 2010 to 2021. The results show that digital transformation is significantly and positively related to symbolic CSR, while it has an inverted U-shaped relationship with substantive CSR, and the higher the level of digital transformation, the more serious the decoupling of CSR. Firms with controlling shareholders’ equity pledges have more serious principal-agent problems, and tend to take advantage of the asymmetric information and manipulability of CSR reporting to conduct symbolic CSR, rather than fulfilling substantive CSR, which exacerbates the decoupling of CSR; firms without controlling shareholders’ equity pledges take into account both substantive and symbolic CSR,so the decoupling phenomenon is not obvious. Further differentiating between nature of the enterprise is tested and the principal-agent mechanism still holds. The conclusion enriches the theoretical framework of the relationship between digital transformation and CSR under paradox management, reveals the heterogeneous performance of CSR under the dual roles of legitimacy pressure and principal-agent, as well as the paradox management strategy, and provides new ideas for further explaining the complex paradoxical relationship.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

田虹,刘雨湉.数字化转型的合法性困境:企业社会责任“象征承诺”与“实质履行”的代理冲突[J].研究与发展管理,2026,38(1):52~63

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-04
  • 最后修改日期:2025-02-20
  • 录用日期:2025-07-16
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-03-18
  • 出版日期: 2026-03-17
文章二维码

扫码关注

官方微信